Respectively there are things that each system does better than the other, and there are things that we both do well that may not be culturally appropriate for the other side. Their system is more teacher based, and it works. They'll benefit from differentiating a little to inculcate some collaborative skills, but I think changing their approach radically would be a mistake. I acknowledge that when I'm commenting on either Indian or American education I'm talking about what is working, not the converse. If we focus on what is working we are better off than trying to pail out water in a sinking ship. Our system creates very dynamic thinkers who are apt to experiment and eager to work together to explore ideas. We do lack focus and it can create some holes in students academic knowledge. We don't need to close the gap with the top Indian students knowledge and math skills, but we need to close it enough so when our students are creating their innovative solutions to problems, they are doing so with enough background to make it count, and to drive their eagerness to learn. Anyone who thinks American kids don't want to learn, doesn't listen to kids and subsequently doesn't ask them the right questions.
Although our focus maybe off kilter with our do everything-for-everybody schools and super soccer infinite goal households, we do offer a breadth of academic exposure that prepares our students to be whole systems thinkers. We may get carried away by offering a million electives, but on the Indian side they often ditch social sciences at 10th grade. Why create engineers, researchers, or business leaders who don't understand the complexity of the society they are working in? We offer all these wonderful subjects, but they often seem isolated and we miss the opportunity to show the interdependency of different subject areas as real world examples. What the Indians do, they do well. There seems to be flawless horizontal and vertical integration of their organization from pre-k to 12th, or 2.5-18. We need to carefully look at these positive characteristics and ask ourselves how can we improve our system to leverage our strengths? Or more directly how can we improve our organizations to improve student performance while building on their ability to think critically and creatively. If we try to fix our problems by addressing the negative we will create more problems. Indian teachers don't have a lot freedom in their curriculum, and that will not work for us. We can create a more student-centered teacher-driven model by improving the focus and streamlining the organization. Will we have to give up or alter the 89 electives and massive sports facilities and programs we offer? Maybe, but if the argument for keeping them is that those classes are what keep students interested and offer exposure, then what are we doing in the other classes? We should shrink the scope as the Indians already do (but keep social studies), and provide enriching activities and programs as a secondary function of the teachers and school. I'll have plenty of time to right in this vain later, back to the weekend.

This should be a busy and eye opening week in that my involvement at the school will increase, and then I'll embark on some traveling with Rajagopal. I've downloaded some pictures, so I'll add them here at the end. One is a very light traffic pic, just note for us rule laden Americans, that there are no rules here. When going through an intersection you just proceed, honk, and weave. I think this would freak out most of us and the fact that they drive on the other side of the road further complicates crossing the street. If intersections have no meaning where and how do you cross the street? 3-D frogger.
The last pic is what I see when I exit my hotel, I'll have a ton pics of me with people and some school pics from Devika.
No comments:
Post a Comment